Artikkel 66
Urgency procedure

Offisielle tekster Retningslinjer
og beslutninger
Vurderinger
EU-regulering
Vurderinger
nasj. regulering
Vis forordningens fortaletekst relatert til art. 66 keyboard_arrow_down Skjul forordningens fortaletekst relatert til art. 66 keyboard_arrow_up

(137) There may be an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular when the danger exists that the enforcement of a right of a data subject could be considerably impeded. A supervisory authority should therefore be able to adopt duly justified provisional measures on its territory with a specified period of validity which should not exceed three months.

Det finnes ingen fortaletekst i direktivet relatert til art. 66.

GDPR

The urgency procedure allows a supervisory authority in exceptional circumstances to take an urgent provisional measure, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65,. that is, without requesting the opinion or a binding decision by the Board.

Article 66 provides several categories of urgency procedures which differ according to the intensity of the cooperation between the competent supervisory authority and the European Data Protection Board.

In the first scenario, the national supervisory authority may act a priori on its own.  In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority considers that there is an urgent need to act to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects in its own territory with a specified validity period which shall not exceed three months. However, article 66 does not specify such circumstances or the scope of these measures. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them to the other authorities concerned, to the Board and to the Commission (paragraph 1).

Where a supervisory authority considers that the provisional measures must be extended by final measures, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board. (paragraph 2).

In the second scenario, any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board where a competent supervisory authority has not introduced an appropriate measure where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects. The supervisory authority must specifically give reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including reasons for the urgent need to act. This is an original control mechanism for the European authorities, under the aegis of the Board (paragraph 3).

When the notice or a binding decision is urgently requested, paragraph 4 provides reduced delays in which the Board must adopt its opinion or decision. Thus, the Board must adopt its opinion or decision within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board.

Direktivet

There was no corresponding provision in the regime of the Directive.

Utfordringer

Although the principle behind these urgency procedures is excellent, the vagueness of their content and their effects present a risk for creating difficulty during implementation in the internal law. The Member states are required to integrate these procedures into their internal legal system, which runs the risk to create disparities in the effectiveness between the Member States due to these ambiguities and the potential for greatly differing practices.

Nothing is said either on the choice between an opinion or decision of the Board which appear to have the sovereign power of the national control authority. There too, very different practices could emerge depending on the degree of political courage and responsibility of each supervisory authority.

Forordning
1e 2e

Art. 66

1.   In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority concerned considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65 or the procedure referred to in Article 60, immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects on its own territory with a specified period of validity which shall not exceed three months. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them to the other supervisory authorities concerned, to the Board and to the Commission.

2.   Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision.

3.   Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision, as the case may be, from the Board where a competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act.

4.   By derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board.

1. forslag close

Art. 61 

1. In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the interests of data subjects, in particular when the danger exists that the enforcement of a right of a data subject could be considerably impeded by means of an alteration of the existing state or for averting major disadvantages or for other reasons, by way of derogation from the procedure referred to in Article 58, it may immediately adopt provisional measures with a specified period of validity. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures, with full reasons, to the European Data Protection Board and to the Commission.

2.  Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion of the European Data Protection Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion, including for the urgency of final measures.

3. Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion where the competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the interests of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion, including for the urgent need to act.

4. By derogation from Article 58(7), an urgent opinion referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the European Data Protection Board.

2. forslag close

Art. 61 

1. In exceptional circumstances, where a concerned supervisory authority considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 57 or the procedure referred to in Article 54a, immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects within the territory of its own Member State, with a specified period of validity. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them, to the other concerned supervisory authorities, the European Data Protection Board and to the Commission.

2. Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the European Data Protection Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision.

3. Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision, as the case may be, from the European Data Protection Board where a competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act.

4. By derogation from paragraph 7 of Article 58 and paragraph 2 of Article 58a, an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the European Data Protection Board.

 

 

Direktiv close

No specific provision

Art. 66

Framgangsmåte for behandling av hastesaker

1. Dersom en berørt tilsynsmyndighet i særlige tilfeller anser at det er et akutt behov for å treffe tiltak for å verne registrertes rettigheter og friheter, kan den som unntak fra konsistensmekanismen nevnt i artikkel 63, 64 og 65 eller framgangsmåten nevnt i artikkel 60 omgående treffe midlertidige tiltak som skal ha rettsvirkning på eget territorium, med en fastsatt gyldighetsperiode på høyst tre måneder. Tilsynsmyndigheten skal uten opphold underrette de andre berørte tilsynsmyndighetene, Personvernrådet og Kommisjonen om nevnte tiltak og årsakene til at de er truffet.

2. Dersom en tilsynsmyndighet har truffet et tiltak i henhold til nr. 1 og anser at det omgående må treffes endelige tiltak, kan den anmode om en hasteuttalelse eller en bindende hastebeslutning fra Personvernrådet; anmodningen om nevnte uttalelse eller beslutning skal være begrunnet.

3. Enhver tilsynsmyndighet kan anmode om en hasteuttalelse eller eventuelt om en bindende hastebeslutning fra Personvernrådet dersom en vedkommende tilsynsmyndighet ikke har truffet et egnet tiltak i en situasjon der det er et akutt behov for å treffe tiltak for å verne registrertes rettigheter og friheter; anmodningen om nevnte uttalelse eller beslutning, herunder det akutte behovet for å treffe tiltak, skal være begrunnet.

4. Som unntak fra artikkel 64 nr. 3 og artikkel 65 nr. 2 skal en hasteuttalelse eller en bindende hastebeslutning som nevnt i nr. 2 og 3 i denne artikkel vedtas innen to uker ved simpelt flertall blant Personvernrådets medlemmer.

Gamle loven close

Ingen tilsvarende bestemmelse

close